LLM Token Estimator
Paste any text or code to estimate token counts across major LLM models. See API costs, context window usage, and per-model breakdowns — all client-side with no API calls.
Frequently Asked Questions
How are LLM tokens counted?▼
Tokens are not exactly words or characters — they're subword units created by tokenization algorithms like BPE (Byte Pair Encoding). On average, 1 token ≈ 4 characters or 0.75 words in English. Code and special characters can tokenize differently: a line of Python might use more tokens per word than plain prose. This estimator uses heuristics that approximate within ~10% of actual counts.
Why do different models have different token counts for the same text?▼
Each model uses its own tokenizer vocabulary. GPT-4o uses cl100k_base (100k vocab), Claude uses Anthropic's tokenizer, Llama uses a SentencePiece tokenizer, and Mistral uses its own variant. The vocabularies differ in how they split words, handle whitespace, and encode code symbols — leading to different token counts for identical text, usually within 5-15% of each other.
What is a context window and why does it matter?▼
A context window is the maximum number of tokens a model can process at once — both input (your prompt + conversation history) and output combined. GPT-4o supports 128K tokens, Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports 200K, and Gemini 1.5 Pro supports up to 1M. Exceeding the context window means the model can't see earlier parts of your conversation. This is critical for long document analysis or multi-turn chats.
How do I reduce token usage to save costs?▼
Common strategies: (1) Use shorter, more direct prompts — remove filler words. (2) Truncate or summarize long documents before sending. (3) Use system prompts efficiently — avoid repeating instructions. (4) For code review, send only the changed diff, not the full file. (5) Enable streaming to stop generation early if you have enough output. (6) Use smaller models (Haiku, GPT-4o-mini) for simple tasks.
What's the difference between input and output token pricing?▼
LLM providers charge separately for input tokens (your prompt) and output tokens (the model's response). Output tokens typically cost 3-5x more than input tokens because generation is computationally expensive. For example, Claude 3.5 Sonnet charges $3/M input but $15/M output. If you're building a chatbot, minimizing output length (concise responses, structured data instead of prose) significantly reduces costs.
Related Products
on GumroadAI Prompt Engineering Toolkit
58 structured prompt templates for Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini — organized by use case. Code Review, Debugging, Documentation, Architecture, and 10 model-specific tips. Stop writing prompts from scratch.
Buy on Gumroad →AI Developer Prompts Pack
55 battle-tested prompt templates for the workflows developers actually use: code review, debugging, architecture, documentation, and testing. Stop writing prompts from scratch.
Buy on Gumroad →Developer Productivity Bundle
Stop rebuilding the same setup every project. 51 VSCode snippets, 40 Git aliases, 5 Docker Compose stacks, 5 GitHub Actions workflows, 5 README templates, and a dotfiles kit. Set up a professional dev environment in under an hour.
Buy on Gumroad →You Might Also Need
LLM Cost Calculator
Compare monthly API costs across GPT-4o, Claude Sonnet, Gemini Pro, and 12+ models. Enter daily requests and token counts for instant cost estimates.
Open free tool →
AI Prompt Cost Calculator
Calculate daily and monthly API costs for GPT-4o, Claude 3.5, Gemini 1.5, and more. Enter token counts, model, and request volume to get instant cost projections.
Open free tool →
OpenAPI Validator
Paste your OpenAPI 3.x spec (YAML or JSON) to validate structure, find missing required fields, detect duplicate paths, check for missing operationIds, and get errors and warnings with path references.
Open free tool →
More Free Tools
Related Articles
Prompt Engineering Techniques 2026: Chain-of-Thought, RAG, and Advanced Patterns
Advanced prompt engineering guide for 2026: Chain-of-Thought, Tree-of-Thought, RAG integration, few-shot learning, prompt chaining, and evaluation techniques.
Vercel AI SDK: Complete Guide to Streaming, Tool Calling & Multi-Provider in 2026
Master the Vercel AI SDK in 2026. Streaming text and objects, tool calling, multi-provider support (OpenAI, Claude, Gemini), agents, and production patterns. TypeScript-first guide.
Claude API Complete Guide for Developers 2026: Models, Pricing & Best Practices
Complete guide to the Claude API in 2026. Covers model lineup, TypeScript and Python integration, system prompts, tool use, vision, prompt caching, extended thinking, batch processing, and production patterns.
Prompt Engineering Techniques for Developers in 2026
Master prompt engineering for developers: chain-of-thought, few-shot learning, RAG prompting, system prompts, XML structuring, and advanced techniques that dramatically improve LLM output quality in production.
OpenAI Agents SDK vs Claude API vs Gemini: Building Production AI Agents 2026
Complete comparison of OpenAI Agents SDK, Claude API, and Gemini for production AI agents in 2026. Multi-agent workflows, tool use, streaming, cost, tracing, and when to use each.
Enjoying this tool? Get more like it.
Weekly developer tool guides, productivity playbooks & AI tricks. Free. No spam.
Unlock AI-Powered Dev Tools
- ⚡ AI Code Review, Doc Generator & SQL Builder
- ⚡ All premium templates & early access
- ⚡ Member discounts on Gumroad products
$9/mo after trial · Cancel anytime
Want the full toolkit?
Get DevPlaybook Pro
Every template, guide, boilerplate, and automation script in one bundle. 13 premium products — grab them all at once and save big.
MIT licensed · Instant download · No subscription
See what's included → Browse all deals →